Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10000000001100000011… |
… | …110011100011010101110 |
3 | 10220021012122202221210022 |
4 | 100001200132130122232 |
5 | 121020103314034410 |
6 | 2201504030042142 |
7 | 142361014310114 |
oct | 20014036343256 |
9 | 3807178687708 |
10 | 1101130221230 |
11 | 394a94337a26 |
12 | 1594a6349352 |
13 | 7cab3caa830 |
14 | 3b41b631ab4 |
15 | 1d999d06455 |
hex | 1006079c6ae |
1101130221230 has 256 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2399745761280. Its totient is φ = 359815053312.
The previous prime is 1101130221223. The next prime is 1101130221263. The reversal of 1101130221230 is 321220311011.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1101130221199 and 1101130221208.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 127 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 773808299 + ... + 773809721.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (9374006880).
Almost surely, 21101130221230 is an apocalyptic number.
1101130221230 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
1101130221230 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1298615540050).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1101130221230 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1101130221230 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1795.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 72, while the sum is 17.
Adding to 1101130221230 its reverse (321220311011), we get a palindrome (1422350532241).
The spelling of 1101130221230 in words is "one trillion, one hundred one billion, one hundred thirty million, two hundred twenty-one thousand, two hundred thirty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •