Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11001000010110001000111… |
… | …000001110111111011101010 |
3 | 112102222102000212112200211120 |
4 | 121002301013001313323222 |
5 | 103414023422222342302 |
6 | 1030130121352440110 |
7 | 32125306623352032 |
oct | 3102610701677352 |
9 | 472872025480746 |
10 | 110141333012202 |
11 | 3210474a11a108 |
12 | 1042a1656a9036 |
13 | 495c38b08946b |
14 | 1d2ac246048c2 |
15 | cb00674959bc |
hex | 642c47077eea |
110141333012202 has 16 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 220503611538912. Its totient is φ = 36676953418320.
The previous prime is 110141333012189. The next prime is 110141333012251. The reversal of 110141333012202 is 202210333141011.
110141333012202 is digitally balanced in base 4, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1101413330122022 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9206056624 + ... + 9206068587.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (13781475721182).
Almost surely, 2110141333012202 is an apocalyptic number.
110141333012202 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (110362278526710).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
110141333012202 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
110141333012202 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 18412126213.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 864, while the sum is 24.
Adding to 110141333012202 its reverse (202210333141011), we get a palindrome (312351666153213).
The spelling of 110141333012202 in words is "one hundred ten trillion, one hundred forty-one billion, three hundred thirty-three million, twelve thousand, two hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.201 sec. • engine limits •