Search a number
-
+
11106115710731 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010000110011101100000…
…0101001110111100001011
31110022201211022002022111222
42201213120011032330023
52423430311110220411
635342025031312255
72224250620635266
oct241473005167413
943281738068458
1011106115710731
1135a2093867aa8
1212b453381b68b
136273c0c84032
142a5778925cdd
15143d677864db
hexa19d814ef0b

11106115710731 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 11106115710732. Its totient is φ = 11106115710730.

The previous prime is 11106115710629. The next prime is 11106115710733. The reversal of 11106115710731 is 13701751160111.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 11106115710731 - 214 = 11106115694347 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×111061157107312 (a number of 27 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

Together with 11106115710733, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 11106115710691 and 11106115710700.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (11106115710733) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 5553057855365 + 5553057855366.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (5553057855366).

Almost surely, 211106115710731 is an apocalyptic number.

11106115710731 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

11106115710731 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

11106115710731 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 4410, while the sum is 35.

Adding to 11106115710731 its reverse (13701751160111), we get a palindrome (24807866870842).

The spelling of 11106115710731 in words is "eleven trillion, one hundred six billion, one hundred fifteen million, seven hundred ten thousand, seven hundred thirty-one".