Search a number
-
+
113331034042021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11001110001001011110000…
…000001101010111010100101
3112212021100012121202202200001
4121301023300001222322211
5104323303424203321041
61041011320331421301
732604616446641035
oct3161136001527245
9485240177682601
10113331034042021
1133124470201284
1210864391bb4831
134b310bc2c0c23
141ddb3738738c5
15d18000de7131
hex6712f006aea5

113331034042021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 113331034042022. Its totient is φ = 113331034042020.

The previous prime is 113331034041997. The next prime is 113331034042067. The reversal of 113331034042021 is 120240430133311.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 79526461253121 + 33804572788900 = 8917761^2 + 5814170^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 113331034042021 - 233 = 113322444107429 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1133310340420212 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (113331034042081) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 56665517021010 + 56665517021011.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (56665517021011).

Almost surely, 2113331034042021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

113331034042021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

113331034042021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

113331034042021 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 5184, while the sum is 28.

Adding to 113331034042021 its reverse (120240430133311), we get a palindrome (233571464175332).

The spelling of 113331034042021 in words is "one hundred thirteen trillion, three hundred thirty-one billion, thirty-four million, forty-two thousand, twenty-one".