Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110100110111110011… |
… | …1000011111001011100 |
3 | 101212001220122221220000 |
4 | 1221233213003321130 |
5 | 3330013131112002 |
6 | 124054343454300 |
7 | 11126445121356 |
oct | 1515747037134 |
9 | 355056587800 |
10 | 113541660252 |
11 | 44175341959 |
12 | 1a008a57390 |
13 | a926191967 |
14 | 56d17080d6 |
15 | 2e47ed361c |
hex | 1a6f9c3e5c |
113541660252 has 60 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 309725579856. Its totient is φ = 36201686400.
The previous prime is 113541660251. The next prime is 113541660263. The reversal of 113541660252 is 252066145311.
113541660252 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 1 + 3 + 5 + 41 + 6 + 602 + 5 + 2 = 666.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×1135416602522 (a number of 23 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (36).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (113541660251) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 19 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 7610749 + ... + 7625652.
Almost surely, 2113541660252 is an apocalyptic number.
113541660252 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
113541660252 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (196183919604).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
113541660252 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
113541660252 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 15236440 (or 15236429 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 43200, while the sum is 36.
The spelling of 113541660252 in words is "one hundred thirteen billion, five hundred forty-one million, six hundred sixty thousand, two hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •