Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 110100111101000111… |
… | …1011000010010100110 |
3 | 101212112100020122100220 |
4 | 1221322033120102212 |
5 | 3330344310023302 |
6 | 124124154145210 |
7 | 11134042031316 |
oct | 1517217302246 |
9 | 355470218326 |
10 | 113720001702 |
11 | 44256a8148a |
12 | 1a058722206 |
13 | a954104948 |
14 | 570b28d446 |
15 | 2e589b04bc |
hex | 1a7a3d84a6 |
113720001702 has 8 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 227440003416. Its totient is φ = 37906667232.
The previous prime is 113720001691. The next prime is 113720001709. The reversal of 113720001702 is 207100027311.
113720001702 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a sphenic number, since it is the product of 3 distinct primes.
113720001702 is an admirable number.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (113720001709) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 9476666803 + ... + 9476666814.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (28430000427).
Almost surely, 2113720001702 is an apocalyptic number.
113720001702 is a primitive abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors, none of which is abundant.
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
113720001702 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
113720001702 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 18953333622.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 588, while the sum is 24.
The spelling of 113720001702 in words is "one hundred thirteen billion, seven hundred twenty million, one thousand, seven hundred two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •