Search a number
-
+
119293382466721 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11011000111111100100111…
…101011111001110010100001
3120122101100001221020010010101
4123013330213223321302201
5111114000321402413341
61101414342350502401
734061443140226531
oct3307744753716241
9518340057203111
10119293382466721
1135013048480951
1211467a34504a01
135174418c99988
142165b8ad2b4c1
15dbd164632831
hex6c7f27af9ca1

119293382466721 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 119293382466722. Its totient is φ = 119293382466720.

The previous prime is 119293382466697. The next prime is 119293382466809. The reversal of 119293382466721 is 127664283392911.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 85707138574225 + 33586243892496 = 9257815^2 + 5795364^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (127664283392911) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 119293382466721 - 219 = 119293381942433 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1192933824667212 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (119293382466221) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 59646691233360 + 59646691233361.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (59646691233361).

Almost surely, 2119293382466721 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

119293382466721 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

119293382466721 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

119293382466721 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its digits is 47029248, while the sum is 64.

The spelling of 119293382466721 in words is "one hundred nineteen trillion, two hundred ninety-three billion, three hundred eighty-two million, four hundred sixty-six thousand, seven hundred twenty-one".