Search a number
-
+
1203010132301 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10001100000011000111…
…111011101100101001101
311021000011211210200012222
4101200120333131211031
5124202231043213201
62320353310105125
7152625466255655
oct21403077354515
94230154720188
101203010132301
1142421494803a
121751997ab1a5
138959c109093
144232420b365
152145e0d191b
hex11818fdd94d

1203010132301 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1203010132302. Its totient is φ = 1203010132300.

The previous prime is 1203010132243. The next prime is 1203010132327. The reversal of 1203010132301 is 1032310103021.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 1112845657225 + 90164475076 = 1054915^2 + 300274^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (1032310103021) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 1203010132301 - 210 = 1203010131277 is a prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 1203010132301.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1203010132381) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 601505066150 + 601505066151.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (601505066151).

Almost surely, 21203010132301 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1203010132301 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1203010132301 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1203010132301 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 108, while the sum is 17.

Adding to 1203010132301 its reverse (1032310103021), we get a palindrome (2235320235322).

The spelling of 1203010132301 in words is "one trillion, two hundred three billion, ten million, one hundred thirty-two thousand, three hundred one".