Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111100110111000010… |
… | …0111011000110011100 |
3 | 110111100102012201022010 |
4 | 1321232010323012130 |
5 | 4120131111201132 |
6 | 140012452351220 |
7 | 12304522666245 |
oct | 1715604730634 |
9 | 414312181263 |
10 | 130695803292 |
11 | 5047841247a |
12 | 213b5915510 |
13 | c42b0a4962 |
14 | 647ba6dccc |
15 | 35edea76cc |
hex | 1e6e13b19c |
130695803292 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 304956874376. Its totient is φ = 43565267760.
The previous prime is 130695803263. The next prime is 130695803321. The reversal of 130695803292 is 292308596031.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (130695803263) and next prime (130695803321).
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (12).
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (48) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5445658459 + ... + 5445658482.
Almost surely, 2130695803292 is an apocalyptic number.
130695803292 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
130695803292 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (174261071084).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
130695803292 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
130695803292 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 10891316948 (or 10891316946 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 699840, while the sum is 48.
The spelling of 130695803292 in words is "one hundred thirty billion, six hundred ninety-five million, eight hundred three thousand, two hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.066 sec. • engine limits •