Search a number
-
+
1321002332021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10011001110010001110…
…111111110111101110101
311200021201220221110112002
4103032101313332331311
5133120403044111041
62450505440305045
7164303445361151
oct23162167767565
94607656843462
101321002332021
1146a263418089
12194029012185
1397754347838
1447d18a28061
1524567b8359b
hex13391dfef75

1321002332021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1321002332022. Its totient is φ = 1321002332020.

The previous prime is 1321002332011. The next prime is 1321002332057. The reversal of 1321002332021 is 1202332001231.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 941121172996 + 379881159025 = 970114^2 + 616345^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 1321002332021 - 214 = 1321002315637 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×13210023320212 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1321002331984 and 1321002332002.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1321002332011) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 660501166010 + 660501166011.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (660501166011).

Almost surely, 21321002332021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1321002332021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1321002332021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1321002332021 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 432, while the sum is 20.

Adding to 1321002332021 its reverse (1202332001231), we get a palindrome (2523334333252).

The spelling of 1321002332021 in words is "one trillion, three hundred twenty-one billion, two million, three hundred thirty-two thousand, twenty-one".