Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011011000100001011… |
… | …100100101001100010111 |
3 | 11201100010102212210200012 |
4 | 103120201130211030113 |
5 | 133310414224033023 |
6 | 2455525100110435 |
7 | 165143140465151 |
oct | 23304134451427 |
9 | 4640112783605 |
10 | 1332001002263 |
11 | 4739979278a8 |
12 | 19619853541b |
13 | 987b7bc7b39 |
14 | 4867d66dad1 |
15 | 249ad55d978 |
hex | 13621725317 |
1332001002263 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1332001002264. Its totient is φ = 1332001002262.
The previous prime is 1332001002259. The next prime is 1332001002323. The reversal of 1332001002263 is 3622001002331.
It is a weak prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 1332001002263 - 22 = 1332001002259 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×13320010022632 (a number of 25 digits) contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1332001002223) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 666000501131 + 666000501132.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (666000501132).
Almost surely, 21332001002263 is an apocalyptic number.
1332001002263 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
1332001002263 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
1332001002263 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1296, while the sum is 23.
Adding to 1332001002263 its reverse (3622001002331), we get a palindrome (4954002004594).
The spelling of 1332001002263 in words is "one trillion, three hundred thirty-two billion, one million, two thousand, two hundred sixty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.064 sec. • engine limits •