Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10011011000110011011… |
… | …101000100011010101010 |
3 | 11201100220111100222100120 |
4 | 103120303131010122222 |
5 | 133312024044320132 |
6 | 2500015051344110 |
7 | 165153466445046 |
oct | 23306335043252 |
9 | 4640814328316 |
10 | 1332303120042 |
11 | 474032418414 |
12 | 196261752036 |
13 | 9883568785b |
14 | 486ab835026 |
15 | 249c9d3a02c |
hex | 136337446aa |
1332303120042 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 2789340624000. Its totient is φ = 423683499008.
The previous prime is 1332303120023. The next prime is 1332303120061. The reversal of 1332303120042 is 2400213032331.
It is an interprime number because it is at equal distance from previous prime (1332303120023) and next prime (1332303120061).
It is a super-3 number, since 3×13323031200423 (a number of 37 digits) contains 333 as substring.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 1332303119994 and 1332303120021.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 23556934 + ... + 23613422.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (43583447250).
Almost surely, 21332303120042 is an apocalyptic number.
1332303120042 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (1457037503958).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1332303120042 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1332303120042 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 58135.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2592, while the sum is 24.
Adding to 1332303120042 its reverse (2400213032331), we get a palindrome (3732516152373).
The spelling of 1332303120042 in words is "one trillion, three hundred thirty-two billion, three hundred three million, one hundred twenty thousand, forty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.079 sec. • engine limits •