Search a number
-
+
1344110381 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101000000011101…
…0111111100101101
310110200011212210222
41100013113330231
510223043013011
6341212541125
745210515105
oct12007277455
93420155728
101344110381
1162a796029
123161817a5
131856106b3
14ca724205
157d004ddb
hex501d7f2d

1344110381 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 1344110382. Its totient is φ = 1344110380.

The previous prime is 1344110333. The next prime is 1344110387. The reversal of 1344110381 is 1830114431.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 794958025 + 549152356 = 28195^2 + 23434^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 1344110381 - 210 = 1344109357 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×13441103812 = 3613265432623930322, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 1344110381.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (1344110387) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 672055190 + 672055191.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (672055191).

Almost surely, 21344110381 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

1344110381 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

1344110381 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

1344110381 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1152, while the sum is 26.

The square root of 1344110381 is about 36662.1109730468. The cubic root of 1344110381 is about 1103.5998813137.

The spelling of 1344110381 in words is "one billion, three hundred forty-four million, one hundred ten thousand, three hundred eighty-one".