Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111111001110000111… |
… | …1001000001101010100 |
3 | 110222102201011122000210 |
4 | 1332130033020031110 |
5 | 4211021342311102 |
6 | 142211503205420 |
7 | 12544250065530 |
oct | 1763417101524 |
9 | 428381148023 |
10 | 135765197652 |
11 | 52639a07497 |
12 | 2238b5a6870 |
13 | ca5841c4a6 |
14 | 67dd036bc0 |
15 | 37e906a36c |
hex | 1f9c3c8354 |
135765197652 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 362040527296. Its totient is φ = 38790056448.
The previous prime is 135765197609. The next prime is 135765197671. The reversal of 135765197652 is 256791567531.
135765197652 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 135765197592 and 135765197601.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 808126093 + ... + 808126260.
Almost surely, 2135765197652 is an apocalyptic number.
135765197652 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
135765197652 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (226275329644).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
135765197652 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
135765197652 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1616252367 (or 1616252365 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 11907000, while the sum is 57.
The spelling of 135765197652 in words is "one hundred thirty-five billion, seven hundred sixty-five million, one hundred ninety-seven thousand, six hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •