Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111111100100101101… |
… | …0000100110111001101 |
3 | 111001101112012010101100 |
4 | 1333021122010313031 |
5 | 4214044344323003 |
6 | 142415014333313 |
7 | 12602111466153 |
oct | 1771132046715 |
9 | 431345163340 |
10 | 136523042253 |
11 | 52998775344 |
12 | 2256135a239 |
13 | cb49432750 |
14 | 687194b3d3 |
15 | 3840866ba3 |
hex | 1fc9684dcd |
136523042253 has 96 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 221311778688. Its totient is φ = 80559360000.
The previous prime is 136523042231. The next prime is 136523042267. The reversal of 136523042253 is 352240325631.
136523042253 is a `hidden beast` number, since 1 + 365 + 2 + 3 + 0 + 42 + 253 = 666.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 136523042253 - 213 = 136523034061 is a prime.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (136523042203) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 95 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 92182273 + ... + 92183753.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2305331028).
Almost surely, 2136523042253 is an apocalyptic number.
136523042253 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (13) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
136523042253 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (84788736435).
136523042253 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
136523042253 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1867 (or 1864 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 129600, while the sum is 36.
Adding to 136523042253 its reverse (352240325631), we get a palindrome (488763367884).
The spelling of 136523042253 in words is "one hundred thirty-six billion, five hundred twenty-three million, forty-two thousand, two hundred fifty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •