Search a number
-
+
140883121863031 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100000000010000111101000…
…011011101111100101110111
3200110211021221222211102120111
4200002013220123233211313
5121431212113144104111
61215344451313243451
741450320044206152
oct4002075033574567
9613737858742514
10140883121863031
1140987218526a09
1213974114563587
13607c2b55032c2
1426b0acac76c99
151144a5edb3a21
hex8021e86ef977

140883121863031 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 140883121863032. Its totient is φ = 140883121863030.

The previous prime is 140883121862957. The next prime is 140883121863199. The reversal of 140883121863031 is 130368121388041.

140883121863031 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a weak prime.

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (130368121388041) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 140883121863031 - 29 = 140883121862519 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×1408831218630312 (a number of 29 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (140883121867031) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 70441560931515 + 70441560931516.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (70441560931516).

Almost surely, 2140883121863031 is an apocalyptic number.

140883121863031 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

140883121863031 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

140883121863031 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 663552, while the sum is 49.

The spelling of 140883121863031 in words is "one hundred forty trillion, eight hundred eighty-three billion, one hundred twenty-one million, eight hundred sixty-three thousand, thirty-one".