Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11000101100100010101… |
… | …011111010000100101000 |
3 | 20000020111101210121101211 |
4 | 120230202223322010220 |
5 | 210301122032023240 |
6 | 3335344554322504 |
7 | 233416400063602 |
oct | 30544253720450 |
9 | 6006441717354 |
10 | 1697094017320 |
11 | 5a4808369809 |
12 | 234aa9429434 |
13 | c405c67b8b0 |
14 | 5c1d581a172 |
15 | 2e22a64bbea |
hex | 18b22afa128 |
1697094017320 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 4112189350920. Its totient is φ = 626619329280.
The previous prime is 1697094017257. The next prime is 1697094017327. The reversal of 1697094017320 is 237104907961.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 1291118603076 + 405975414244 = 1136274^2 + 637162^2 .
It is a Smith number, since the sum of its digits (49) coincides with the sum of the digits of its prime factors.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (1697094017327) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 1631820651 + ... + 1631821690.
Almost surely, 21697094017320 is an apocalyptic number.
1697094017320 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (10) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
1697094017320 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (2415095333600).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
1697094017320 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
1697094017320 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 3263642365 (or 3263642361 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 571536, while the sum is 49.
The spelling of 1697094017320 in words is "one trillion, six hundred ninety-seven billion, ninety-four million, seventeen thousand, three hundred twenty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.063 sec. • engine limits •