Search a number
-
+
17339868831029 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1111110001010100000010…
…1110001101110100110101
32021101200020021100201110012
43330111000232031310311
54233044022410043104
6100513454211110005
73436523054121143
oct374250056156465
967350207321405
1017339868831029
1155858849a6498
121b406baba2305
1398a1b142a414
1443d37b48c593
152010b3027d6e
hexfc540b8dd35

17339868831029 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 17339868831030. Its totient is φ = 17339868831028.

The previous prime is 17339868830989. The next prime is 17339868831037. The reversal of 17339868831029 is 92013886893371.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 15794504092900 + 1545364738129 = 3974230^2 + 1243127^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 17339868831029 - 224 = 17339852053813 is a prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 17339868831029.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (17339868831529) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 8669934415514 + 8669934415515.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (8669934415515).

Almost surely, 217339868831029 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

17339868831029 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

17339868831029 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

17339868831029 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 94058496, while the sum is 68.

The spelling of 17339868831029 in words is "seventeen trillion, three hundred thirty-nine billion, eight hundred sixty-eight million, eight hundred thirty-one thousand, twenty-nine".