Search a number
-
+
18657851242741 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1000011111000000111101…
…00110000111100011110101
32110001200011201210100002221
410033200132212013203311
54421142234404231431
6103403144252202341
73633661642562044
oct417403646074365
973050151710087
1018657851242741
115a43828687767
1221140247693b1
13a54573c07659
1448708ada655b
152255009d0111
hex10f81e9878f5

18657851242741 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 18657851242742. Its totient is φ = 18657851242740.

The previous prime is 18657851242727. The next prime is 18657851242783. The reversal of 18657851242741 is 14724215875681.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 10812614368516 + 7845236874225 = 3288254^2 + 2800935^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-18657851242741 is a prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 18657851242741.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (18657851242721) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 9328925621370 + 9328925621371.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (9328925621371).

Almost surely, 218657851242741 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

18657851242741 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

18657851242741 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

18657851242741 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 30105600, while the sum is 61.

The spelling of 18657851242741 in words is "eighteen trillion, six hundred fifty-seven billion, eight hundred fifty-one million, two hundred forty-two thousand, seven hundred forty-one".