Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10111101010010… |
… | …10011101001000 |
3 | 111211111010101010 |
4 | 23311022131020 |
5 | 401303021312 |
6 | 31410123520 |
7 | 4630046616 |
oct | 1365123510 |
9 | 454433333 |
10 | 198485832 |
11 | a2049386 |
12 | 565805a0 |
13 | 3217704c |
14 | 1c50a6b6 |
15 | 1265a93c |
hex | bd4a748 |
198485832 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 506479680. Its totient is φ = 64806912.
The previous prime is 198485827. The next prime is 198485843. The reversal of 198485832 is 238584891.
198485832 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a hoax number, since the sum of its digits (48) coincides with the sum of the digits of its distinct prime factors.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 337843 + ... + 338429.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (7913745).
Almost surely, 2198485832 is an apocalyptic number.
198485832 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (12) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a pronic number, being equal to 14088×14089.
It is an amenable number.
198485832 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (307993848).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
198485832 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
198485832 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 862 (or 858 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 552960, while the sum is 48.
The square root of 198485832 is about 14088.4999911275. The cubic root of 198485832 is about 583.3239894739.
The spelling of 198485832 in words is "one hundred ninety-eight million, four hundred eighty-five thousand, eight hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.063 sec. • engine limits •