Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001000111000000101110… |
… | …11010101011111000110110 |
3 | 2121221001101220112211201210 |
4 | 10203200113122223320312 |
5 | 10111201240301340042 |
6 | 110334343512302250 |
7 | 4135162421301030 |
oct | 443402732537066 |
9 | 77831356484653 |
10 | 20032120340022 |
11 | 642363577199a |
12 | 22b64386a1986 |
13 | b24036a38aab |
14 | 4d37ba128c50 |
15 | 24b134be3a9c |
hex | 1238176abe36 |
20032120340022 has 32 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 47778473359872. Its totient is φ = 5474616738624.
The previous prime is 20032120339961. The next prime is 20032120340027. The reversal of 20032120340022 is 22004302123002.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (21).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (20032120340027) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 10368591343 + ... + 10368593274.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1493077292496).
Almost surely, 220032120340022 is an apocalyptic number.
20032120340022 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (27746353019850).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
20032120340022 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
20032120340022 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 20737184652.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1152, while the sum is 21.
Adding to 20032120340022 its reverse (22004302123002), we get a palindrome (42036422463024).
The spelling of 20032120340022 in words is "twenty trillion, thirty-two billion, one hundred twenty million, three hundred forty thousand, twenty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.235 sec. • engine limits •