Search a number
-
+
22202434110341 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010000110001011010000…
…01100101100001110000101
32220121112100210210122210002
411003011220030230032011
510402231041113012331
6115115354000411045
74451034005045402
oct503055014541605
986545323718702
1022202434110341
11708aaaa26a161
1225a6b92316a85
13c508b0236a44
1456a8641ab2a9
15287809d4a9cb
hex14316832c385

22202434110341 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 22202434110342. Its totient is φ = 22202434110340.

The previous prime is 22202434110331. The next prime is 22202434110413. The reversal of 22202434110341 is 14301143420222.

Together with next prime (22202434110413) it forms an Ormiston pair, because they use the same digits, order apart.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 18697754328100 + 3504679782241 = 4324090^2 + 1872079^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-22202434110341 is a prime.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (22202434110331) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 11101217055170 + 11101217055171.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (11101217055171).

Almost surely, 222202434110341 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

22202434110341 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

22202434110341 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

22202434110341 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 9216, while the sum is 29.

Adding to 22202434110341 its reverse (14301143420222), we get a palindrome (36503577530563).

The spelling of 22202434110341 in words is "twenty-two trillion, two hundred two billion, four hundred thirty-four million, one hundred ten thousand, three hundred forty-one".