Search a number
-
+
22230044644229 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1010000110111110101011…
…11010100001001110000101
32220201011122000220002212022
411003133111322201032011
510403204112412103404
6115140201434132525
74453032141522632
oct503372572411605
986634560802768
1022230044644229
1170a0788735a04
1225b03b8b81145
13c53390560a66
1456bd23139189
152883c3cce8be
hex1437d5ea1385

22230044644229 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 22230044644230. Its totient is φ = 22230044644228.

The previous prime is 22230044644127. The next prime is 22230044644259. The reversal of 22230044644229 is 92244644003222.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 18417015165025 + 3813029479204 = 4291505^2 + 1952698^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-22230044644229 is a prime.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 22230044644229.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (22230044644259) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 11115022322114 + 11115022322115.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (11115022322115).

Almost surely, 222230044644229 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

22230044644229 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

22230044644229 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

22230044644229 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1327104, while the sum is 44.

The spelling of 22230044644229 in words is "twenty-two trillion, two hundred thirty billion, forty-four million, six hundred forty-four thousand, two hundred twenty-nine".