Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1010100011110010101010… |
… | …01010011100001000101111 |
3 | 10001012210221020221120020011 |
4 | 11101321111022130020233 |
5 | 11020414101113032343 |
6 | 121215044132434051 |
7 | 4614406535315224 |
oct | 521712512341057 |
9 | 101183836846204 |
10 | 23220022002223 |
11 | 7442613091592 |
12 | 2730242478927 |
13 | cc583c2422a7 |
14 | 5a3bd840794b |
15 | 2a40156b429d |
hex | 151e5529c22f |
23220022002223 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 23220022002224. Its totient is φ = 23220022002222.
The previous prime is 23220022002209. The next prime is 23220022002239. The reversal of 23220022002223 is 32220022002232.
It is a weak prime.
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 23220022002223 - 213 = 23220021994031 is a prime.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 23220022002194 and 23220022002203.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (23220022002263) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 11610011001111 + 11610011001112.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (11610011001112).
Almost surely, 223220022002223 is an apocalyptic number.
23220022002223 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
23220022002223 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
23220022002223 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2304, while the sum is 22.
Adding to 23220022002223 its reverse (32220022002232), we get a palindrome (55440044004455).
Subtracting 23220022002223 from its reverse (32220022002232), we obtain a palindrome (9000000000009).
The spelling of 23220022002223 in words is "twenty-three trillion, two hundred twenty billion, twenty-two million, two thousand, two hundred twenty-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •