Search a number
-
+
2580953849 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1001100111010110…
…0011101011111001
320122212112001002022
42121311203223321
520241211010344
61104034444225
7120646513535
oct23165435371
96585461068
102580953849
111104976911
12600433675
13321934a36
141a6ac4bc5
151018bc0ee
hex99d63af9

2580953849 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 2580953850. Its totient is φ = 2580953848.

The previous prime is 2580953707. The next prime is 2580953917. The reversal of 2580953849 is 9483590852.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2247234025 + 333719824 = 47405^2 + 18268^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-2580953849 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×25809538492 = 13322645541335829602, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 2580953849.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (2580956849) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1290476924 + 1290476925.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1290476925).

Almost surely, 22580953849 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

2580953849 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

2580953849 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

2580953849 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 3110400, while the sum is 53.

The square root of 2580953849 is about 50803.0889710458. The cubic root of 2580953849 is about 1371.7029720272.

The spelling of 2580953849 in words is "two billion, five hundred eighty million, nine hundred fifty-three thousand, eight hundred forty-nine".