Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011111111111010… |
… | …010000110110100000 |
3 | 2212121011100012200221 |
4 | 123333322100312200 |
5 | 443032144022412 |
6 | 21451052052424 |
7 | 2112665361265 |
oct | 337772206640 |
9 | 85534305627 |
10 | 30063267232 |
11 | 11827a266a9 |
12 | 59b0164114 |
13 | 2ab151722b |
14 | 16529d726c |
15 | bae474b07 |
hex | 6ffe90da0 |
30063267232 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 61102129032. Its totient is φ = 14549483520.
The previous prime is 30063267217. The next prime is 30063267233. The reversal of 30063267232 is 23276236003.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 28494790416 + 1568476816 = 168804^2 + 39604^2 .
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (30063267233) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 162732 + ... + 294292.
Almost surely, 230063267232 is an apocalyptic number.
30063267232 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (32) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 30063267232, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (30551064516).
30063267232 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (31038861800).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
30063267232 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30063267232 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 131801 (or 131793 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 54432, while the sum is 34.
The spelling of 30063267232 in words is "thirty billion, sixty-three million, two hundred sixty-seven thousand, two hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.086 sec. • engine limits •