Search a number
-
+
30207225445349 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101101111001001010101…
…11100010011101111100101
310221221210010110221002122112
412313210222330103233211
512424403344203222344
6144125001403410405
76235254130535441
oct667445274235745
9127853113832575
1030207225445349
1196968a3299297
12347a442823a05
1313b16b568a474
14766074d11821
15375b5c74ac9e
hex1b792af13be5

30207225445349 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 30207225445350. Its totient is φ = 30207225445348.

The previous prime is 30207225445289. The next prime is 30207225445379. The reversal of 30207225445349 is 94354452270203.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 19887184845025 + 10320040600324 = 4459505^2 + 3212482^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 30207225445349 - 216 = 30207225379813 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×302072254453492 (a number of 28 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 30207225445297 and 30207225445306.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (30207225445379) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 15103612722674 + 15103612722675.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (15103612722675).

Almost surely, 230207225445349 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

30207225445349 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

30207225445349 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

30207225445349 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 7257600, while the sum is 50.

The spelling of 30207225445349 in words is "thirty trillion, two hundred seven billion, two hundred twenty-five million, four hundred forty-five thousand, three hundred forty-nine".