Search a number
-
+
3023321332231 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin101011111111101011111…
…111100111101000000111
3101201000201110110200222201
4223333223333213220013
5344013230230112411
610232521124335331
7431266502211244
oct53775377475007
911630643420881
103023321332231
11a6620208a872
12409b34244547
1318c137348785
14a648834c5cb
155399bd783c1
hex2bfebfe7a07

3023321332231 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3023321332232. Its totient is φ = 3023321332230.

The previous prime is 3023321332211. The next prime is 3023321332243. The reversal of 3023321332231 is 1322331233203.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-3023321332231 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×30233213322312 (a number of 26 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 3023321332231.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3023321332211) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (29) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1511660666115 + 1511660666116.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1511660666116).

Almost surely, 23023321332231 is an apocalyptic number.

3023321332231 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3023321332231 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3023321332231 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 11664, while the sum is 28.

Adding to 3023321332231 its reverse (1322331233203), we get a palindrome (4345652565434).

The spelling of 3023321332231 in words is "three trillion, twenty-three billion, three hundred twenty-one million, three hundred thirty-two thousand, two hundred thirty-one".