Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 111001101110… |
… | …1010010100100 |
3 | 2002221200212200 |
4 | 1303131102210 |
5 | 30222012112 |
6 | 3000414500 |
7 | 515155422 |
oct | 163352244 |
9 | 62850780 |
10 | 30266532 |
11 | 160a276a |
12 | a177430 |
13 | 63693ba |
14 | 403c112 |
15 | 29cccdc |
hex | 1cdd4a4 |
30266532 has 36 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 76727196. Its totient is φ = 10059840.
The previous prime is 30266527. The next prime is 30266549. The reversal of 30266532 is 23566203.
30266532 is a `hidden beast` number, since 3 + 0 + 2 + 6 + 653 + 2 = 666.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 389376 + 29877156 = 624^2 + 5466^2 .
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (36).
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 30266496 and 30266505.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 14158 + ... + 16154.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2131311).
Almost surely, 230266532 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
30266532 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (46460664).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
30266532 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
30266532 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 2428 (or 2423 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 6480, while the sum is 27.
The square root of 30266532 is about 5501.5027038074. The cubic root of 30266532 is about 311.6407353847.
The spelling of 30266532 in words is "thirty million, two hundred sixty-six thousand, five hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.081 sec. • engine limits •