Search a number
-
+
311430000310021 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100011011001111100111001…
…0100010100111011100000101
31111211200102021012001021210201
41012303321302202213130011
5311304432120034410041
63022204544514450501
7122412034505204215
oct10663716242473405
91454612235037721
10311430000310021
119025a7a323677a
122ab19278b93a31
13104a095260a428
1456c941465a245
15260102059c631
hex11b3e728a7705

311430000310021 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 311430000310022. Its totient is φ = 311430000310020.

The previous prime is 311430000309991. The next prime is 311430000310049. The reversal of 311430000310021 is 120013000034113.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 164327401950625 + 147102598359396 = 12819025^2 + 12128586^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 311430000310021 - 27 = 311430000309893 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×3114300003100212 (a number of 30 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (311430000310321) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 155715000155010 + 155715000155011.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (155715000155011).

Almost surely, 2311430000310021 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

311430000310021 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

311430000310021 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

311430000310021 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 216, while the sum is 19.

Adding to 311430000310021 its reverse (120013000034113), we get a palindrome (431443000344134).

The spelling of 311430000310021 in words is "three hundred eleven trillion, four hundred thirty billion, three hundred ten thousand, twenty-one".