Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100011100101100010101100… |
… | …1100000001001101010100000 |
3 | 1112001022201002222122201210202 |
4 | 1013023011121200021222200 |
5 | 312012032112323201232 |
6 | 3025424441555244332 |
7 | 122635111033412153 |
oct | 10713053140115240 |
9 | 1461281088581722 |
10 | 313023013100192 |
11 | 90814350446a8a |
12 | 2b135b598a96a8 |
13 | 10587c35a88085 |
14 | 5742574d99c9a |
15 | 262c6a8542162 |
hex | 11cb159809aa0 |
313023013100192 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 616990834855080. Its totient is φ = 156326986432512.
The previous prime is 313023013100191. The next prime is 313023013100207. The reversal of 313023013100192 is 291001310320313.
It is a happy number.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 4 ways, for example, as 310351501305616 + 2671511794576 = 17616796^2 + 1634476^2 .
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (313023013100191) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 7 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 171282968 + ... + 173100840.
Almost surely, 2313023013100192 is an apocalyptic number.
313023013100192 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (32) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
313023013100192 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (303967821754888).
313023013100192 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
313023013100192 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1824225 (or 1824217 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2916, while the sum is 29.
The spelling of 313023013100192 in words is "three hundred thirteen trillion, twenty-three billion, thirteen million, one hundred thousand, one hundred ninety-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.072 sec. • engine limits •