Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1001001111001000011… |
… | …01101101110000010110 |
3 | 1010100011110111012021200 |
4 | 10213210031231300112 |
5 | 20144424010210032 |
6 | 401443244253330 |
7 | 31633340334234 |
oct | 4474415556026 |
9 | 1110143435250 |
10 | 317361413142 |
11 | 112657275a24 |
12 | 5160b841246 |
13 | 23c08973037 |
14 | 11508c1d954 |
15 | 83c697647c |
hex | 49e436dc16 |
317361413142 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 687634244544. Its totient is φ = 105784391664.
The previous prime is 317361413119. The next prime is 317361413267. The reversal of 317361413142 is 241314163713.
317361413142 is a `hidden beast` number, since 3 + 1 + 7 + 3 + 614 + 1 + 31 + 4 + 2 = 666.
It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 317361413097 and 317361413106.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 556728 + ... + 971940.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (28651426856).
Almost surely, 2317361413142 is an apocalyptic number.
317361413142 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (370272831402).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
317361413142 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
317361413142 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 457684 (or 457681 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 36288, while the sum is 36.
Adding to 317361413142 its reverse (241314163713), we get a palindrome (558675576855).
The spelling of 317361413142 in words is "three hundred seventeen billion, three hundred sixty-one million, four hundred thirteen thousand, one hundred forty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.073 sec. • engine limits •