Search a number
-
+
330012200222231 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100101100001001001111001…
…1111101110011111000010111
31121021110212011122111211221212
41023002103303331303320113
5321223404441224102411
63125513302320332035
7126340410652304312
oct11302236375637027
91537425148454855
10330012200222231
119617442a69706a
123101a6aa17401b
131121b02b310077
145b6c96623d979
15282459475868b
hex12c24f3f73e17

330012200222231 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 330012200222232. Its totient is φ = 330012200222230.

The previous prime is 330012200222113. The next prime is 330012200222251. The reversal of 330012200222231 is 132222002210033.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 330012200222231 - 242 = 325614153711127 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×3300122002222312 (a number of 30 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 330012200222197 and 330012200222206.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (330012200222251) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 165006100111115 + 165006100111116.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (165006100111116).

Almost surely, 2330012200222231 is an apocalyptic number.

330012200222231 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

330012200222231 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

330012200222231 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1728, while the sum is 23.

Adding to 330012200222231 its reverse (132222002210033), we get a palindrome (462234202432264).

The spelling of 330012200222231 in words is "three hundred thirty trillion, twelve billion, two hundred million, two hundred twenty-two thousand, two hundred thirty-one".