Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100011001100110… |
… | …0001110111100001 |
3 | 22120222022102212002 |
4 | 3012121201313201 |
5 | 23304104043324 |
6 | 1310143013345 |
7 | 145325321021 |
oct | 30631416741 |
9 | 8528272762 |
10 | 3328581089 |
11 | 1458996269 |
12 | 78a89a255 |
13 | 4107ab512 |
14 | 2380d9a81 |
15 | 14734b3ae |
hex | c6661de1 |
3328581089 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3328581090. Its totient is φ = 3328581088.
The previous prime is 3328581071. The next prime is 3328581097. The reversal of 3328581089 is 9801858233.
3328581089 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a strong prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3238179025 + 90402064 = 56905^2 + 9508^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3328581089 - 220 = 3327532513 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×33285810892 = 22158904132096851842, which contains 22 as substring.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3328586089) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1664290544 + 1664290545.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1664290545).
Almost surely, 23328581089 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
3328581089 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
3328581089 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
3328581089 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 414720, while the sum is 47.
The square root of 3328581089 is about 57693.8565966949. The cubic root of 3328581089 is about 1493.0913535503.
The spelling of 3328581089 in words is "three billion, three hundred twenty-eight million, five hundred eighty-one thousand, eighty-nine".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.103 sec. • engine limits •