Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100100001011111… |
… | …0000010011101110 |
3 | 22200021120112211110 |
4 | 3020113300103232 |
5 | 23341041423012 |
6 | 1313324132450 |
7 | 146206504200 |
oct | 31027602356 |
9 | 8607515743 |
10 | 3361670382 |
11 | 1475636794 |
12 | 799997126 |
13 | 4175c5695 |
14 | 23c670770 |
15 | 14a1d573c |
hex | c85f04ee |
3361670382 has 24 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7821029736. Its totient is φ = 960477168.
The previous prime is 3361670369. The next prime is 3361670413. The reversal of 3361670382 is 2830761633.
3361670382 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×33616703822 = 22601655514432051848, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 3361670382.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 11 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5716833 + ... + 5717420.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (325876239).
Almost surely, 23361670382 is an apocalyptic number.
3361670382 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (4459359354).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3361670382 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3361670382 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.
The sum of its prime factors is 11434272 (or 11434265 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 108864, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 3361670382 is about 57979.9136080764. The cubic root of 3361670382 is about 1498.0226362783.
The spelling of 3361670382 in words is "three billion, three hundred sixty-one million, six hundred seventy thousand, three hundred eighty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •