Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100100111011100… |
… | …1100010100010100 |
3 | 22202000122121122002 |
4 | 3021313030110110 |
5 | 23413443020123 |
6 | 1320020254432 |
7 | 146632244150 |
oct | 31167142424 |
9 | 8660577562 |
10 | 3386688788 |
11 | 148877445a |
12 | 7a6241418 |
13 | 41c845082 |
14 | 241b04060 |
15 | 14c4c8528 |
hex | c9dcc514 |
3386688788 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 7017803520. Its totient is φ = 1399216896.
The previous prime is 3386688769. The next prime is 3386688791. The reversal of 3386688788 is 8878866833.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×33866887882 = 22939321893529817888, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 587456 + ... + 593192.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (146204240).
Almost surely, 23386688788 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 3386688788, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (3508901760).
3386688788 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (3631114732).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
3386688788 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
3386688788 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 6504 (or 6502 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 74317824, while the sum is 65.
The square root of 3386688788 is about 58195.2643090484. The cubic root of 3386688788 is about 1501.7296770080.
The spelling of 3386688788 in words is "three billion, three hundred eighty-six million, six hundred eighty-eight thousand, seven hundred eighty-eight".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •