Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 10100001100001… |
… | …101000010011100 |
3 | 212121101221122210 |
4 | 110030031002130 |
5 | 1143204242302 |
6 | 53340240420 |
7 | 11252162145 |
oct | 2414150234 |
9 | 777357583 |
10 | 338743452 |
11 | 164236a73 |
12 | 95540110 |
13 | 55244718 |
14 | 32dbaacc |
15 | 1eb1366c |
hex | 1430d09c |
338743452 has 12 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 790401416. Its totient is φ = 112914480.
The previous prime is 338743423. The next prime is 338743459. The reversal of 338743452 is 254347833.
It is a tau number, because it is divible by the number of its divisors (12).
It is a super-2 number, since 2×3387434522 = 229494252545752608, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 338743452.
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (338743459) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 14114299 + ... + 14114322.
Almost surely, 2338743452 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
338743452 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (451657964).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
338743452 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
338743452 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 28228628 (or 28228626 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 241920, while the sum is 39.
The square root of 338743452 is about 18404.9844335712. The cubic root of 338743452 is about 697.0923279002.
The spelling of 338743452 in words is "three hundred thirty-eight million, seven hundred forty-three thousand, four hundred fifty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.070 sec. • engine limits •