Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1100101000001110… |
… | …0111100110110101 |
3 | 22202020210010002102 |
4 | 3022003213212311 |
5 | 23420311240133 |
6 | 1320214151445 |
7 | 150002032226 |
oct | 31203474665 |
9 | 8666703072 |
10 | 3389946293 |
11 | 148a599908 |
12 | 7a7352585 |
13 | 4204159a6 |
14 | 24231124d |
15 | 14c91d7e8 |
hex | ca0e79b5 |
3389946293 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3389946294. Its totient is φ = 3389946292.
The previous prime is 3389946289. The next prime is 3389946367. The reversal of 3389946293 is 3926499833.
It is a weak prime.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3085024849 + 304921444 = 55543^2 + 17462^2 .
It is a cyclic number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 3389946293 - 22 = 3389946289 is a prime.
It is a super-2 number, since 2×33899462932 = 22983471738848883698, which contains 22 as substring.
It is a congruent number.
It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3389946223) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1694973146 + 1694973147.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1694973147).
Almost surely, 23389946293 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
3389946293 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).
3389946293 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.
3389946293 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The product of its digits is 7558272, while the sum is 56.
The square root of 3389946293 is about 58223.2452977331. The cubic root of 3389946293 is about 1502.2110049996.
The spelling of 3389946293 in words is "three billion, three hundred eighty-nine million, nine hundred forty-six thousand, two hundred ninety-three".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.068 sec. • engine limits •