Search a number
-
+
3519980672909 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin110011001110001111001…
…100101001011110001101
3110110111200111122100011012
4303032033030221132031
5430132410023013114
611253020133535005
7512211255023231
oct63161714513615
913414614570135
103519980672909
1111378a7362498
1248a2424a4465
131c6c1834954c
14c2521a105c1
156186957663e
hex3338f32978d

3519980672909 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3519980672910. Its totient is φ = 3519980672908.

The previous prime is 3519980672869. The next prime is 3519980672917. The reversal of 3519980672909 is 9092760899153.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 2870916806884 + 649063866025 = 1694378^2 + 805645^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (9092760899153) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-3519980672909 is a prime.

It is a Sophie Germain prime.

It is a Curzon number.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3519980672969) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1759990336454 + 1759990336455.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1759990336455).

Almost surely, 23519980672909 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

3519980672909 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3519980672909 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3519980672909 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 66134880, while the sum is 68.

The spelling of 3519980672909 in words is "three trillion, five hundred nineteen billion, nine hundred eighty million, six hundred seventy-two thousand, nine hundred nine".