Search a number
-
+
3568768331 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101010010110111…
…0001010101001011
3100012201021012210212
43110231301111023
524302101041311
61350043031335
7154303013252
oct32455612513
910181235725
103568768331
111571527517
1283720b54b
1344b49664b
1425bd7d799
1515d492c8b
hexd4b7154b

3568768331 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 3568768332. Its totient is φ = 3568768330.

The previous prime is 3568768241. The next prime is 3568768337. The reversal of 3568768331 is 1338678653.

It is a happy number.

3568768331 is digitally balanced in base 3, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.

It is a strong prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 3568768331 - 218 = 3568506187 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×35687683312 = 25472214800697051122, which contains 22 as substring.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 3568768331.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (3568768337) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 1784384165 + 1784384166.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1784384166).

Almost surely, 23568768331 is an apocalyptic number.

3568768331 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

3568768331 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

3568768331 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its digits is 2177280, while the sum is 50.

The square root of 3568768331 is about 59739.1691522405. The cubic root of 3568768331 is about 1528.1739262001.

The spelling of 3568768331 in words is "three billion, five hundred sixty-eight million, seven hundred sixty-eight thousand, three hundred thirty-one".