Search a number
-
+
38533052586869 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin10001100001011101011001…
…11010010101101101110101
312001102201112200120020220222
420300232230322111231311
520022311142430234434
6213541501234104125
711054630651550131
oct1060565472255565
9161381480506828
1038533052586869
11113068596a3485
1243a3b6941b045
131866860ab0489
1497301c86c3c1
1546c4ee47b72e
hex230bace95b75

38533052586869 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 38533052586870. Its totient is φ = 38533052586868.

The previous prime is 38533052586767. The next prime is 38533052586893. The reversal of 38533052586869 is 96868525033583.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 19977100680625 + 18555951906244 = 4469575^2 + 4307662^2 .

It is an emirp because it is prime and its reverse (96868525033583) is a distict prime.

It is a cyclic number.

It is a de Polignac number, because none of the positive numbers 2k-38533052586869 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×385330525868692 (a number of 28 digits) contains 22 as substring.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (38533052586269) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 19266526293434 + 19266526293435.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (19266526293435).

Almost surely, 238533052586869 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

38533052586869 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

38533052586869 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

38533052586869 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1119744000, while the sum is 71.

The spelling of 38533052586869 in words is "thirty-eight trillion, five hundred thirty-three billion, fifty-two million, five hundred eighty-six thousand, eight hundred sixty-nine".