Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100110110001111010… |
… | …001111101111000000 |
3 | 10222110221010212220000 |
4 | 212301322033233000 |
5 | 1140234210313241 |
6 | 31043503520000 |
7 | 3002603156514 |
oct | 466172175700 |
9 | 128427125800 |
10 | 41639541696 |
11 | 16728487a85 |
12 | 80a0bb9000 |
13 | 3c0795138c |
14 | 2030236144 |
15 | 113a8e6eb6 |
hex | 9b1e8fbc0 |
41639541696 has 280 divisors, whose sum is σ = 126777750000. Its totient is φ = 13508591616.
The previous prime is 41639541679. The next prime is 41639541701. The reversal of 41639541696 is 69614593614.
It is a happy number.
41639541696 is a `hidden beast` number, since 4 + 1 + 6 + 3 + 9 + 541 + 6 + 96 = 666.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (54).
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 39 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 33337680 + ... + 33338928.
Almost surely, 241639541696 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 41639541696, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (63388875000).
41639541696 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (85138208304).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
41639541696 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
41639541696 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1441 (or 1422 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 4199040, while the sum is 54.
The spelling of 41639541696 in words is "forty-one billion, six hundred thirty-nine million, five hundred forty-one thousand, six hundred ninety-six".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.083 sec. • engine limits •