Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 11011110101011… |
… | …100111111110000 |
3 | 1012112201220202210 |
4 | 123311130333300 |
5 | 1424022402412 |
6 | 114201212120 |
7 | 14400260652 |
oct | 3365347760 |
9 | 1175656683 |
10 | 466997232 |
11 | 21a675a29 |
12 | 110491040 |
13 | 7599b430 |
14 | 460446d2 |
15 | 2aee983c |
hex | 1bd5cff0 |
466997232 has 80 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 1302256928. Its totient is φ = 143354880.
The previous prime is 466997189. The next prime is 466997233. The reversal of 466997232 is 232799664.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (48).
It is a congruent number.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (466997233) by changing a digit.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (19) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 15 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 456882 + ... + 457902.
Almost surely, 2466997232 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 466997232, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (651128464).
466997232 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (835259696).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
466997232 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
466997232 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 1778 (or 1772 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its digits is 979776, while the sum is 48.
The square root of 466997232 is about 21610.1187409972. The cubic root of 466997232 is about 775.8386935770.
The spelling of 466997232 in words is "four hundred sixty-six million, nine hundred ninety-seven thousand, two hundred thirty-two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.069 sec. • engine limits •