Search a number
-
+
470459849 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin11100000010101…
…010010111001001
31012210020211120212
4130002222113021
51430414203344
6114403330505
714441562026
oct3402522711
91183224525
10470459849
112216204a2
12111680a35
1376611512
14466a654d
152b48079e
hex1c0aa5c9

470459849 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 470459850. Its totient is φ = 470459848.

The previous prime is 470459839. The next prime is 470459851. The reversal of 470459849 is 948954074.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 455054224 + 15405625 = 21332^2 + 3925^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 470459849 - 28 = 470459593 is a prime.

It is a super-2 number, since 2×4704598492 = 442664939042205602, which contains 22 as substring.

Together with 470459851, it forms a pair of twin primes.

It is a Chen prime.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 470459797 and 470459806.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (470459839) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 235229924 + 235229925.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (235229925).

Almost surely, 2470459849 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

470459849 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

470459849 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

470459849 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 1451520, while the sum is 50.

The square root of 470459849 is about 21690.0864221423. The cubic root of 470459849 is about 777.7514956508.

The spelling of 470459849 in words is "four hundred seventy million, four hundred fifty-nine thousand, eight hundred forty-nine".