Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 101100010010110101… |
… | …011110010101000010 |
3 | 11112202120202020202120 |
4 | 230102311132111002 |
5 | 1234401011214002 |
6 | 33503221425110 |
7 | 3302411560230 |
oct | 542265362502 |
9 | 145676666676 |
10 | 47560648002 |
11 | 1919682286a |
12 | 9273b6b196 |
13 | 463c58648a |
14 | 2432789950 |
15 | 1385648cbc |
hex | b12d5e542 |
47560648002 has 64 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 110660567040. Its totient is φ = 13345393536.
The previous prime is 47560647997. The next prime is 47560648013. The reversal of 47560648002 is 20084606574.
It is a Harshad number since it is a multiple of its sum of digits (42).
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (17) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 31 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 2684758 + ... + 2702414.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (1729071360).
Almost surely, 247560648002 is an apocalyptic number.
47560648002 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (42) formed by its first and last digit.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 47560648002, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (55330283520).
47560648002 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (63099919038).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
47560648002 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
47560648002 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 18815.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 322560, while the sum is 42.
The spelling of 47560648002 in words is "forty-seven billion, five hundred sixty million, six hundred forty-eight thousand, two".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.082 sec. • engine limits •