Search a number
-
+
480838261549 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin1101111111101000011…
…00011001101100101101
31200222010110000112122211
412333310030121230231
530334224043332144
61004521040410421
746511422533562
oct6776414315455
91628113015584
10480838261549
11175a16732818
1279233916a11
133645c3314b9
14193b63c6869
15c79379b034
hex6ff4319b2d

480838261549 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 480838261550. Its totient is φ = 480838261548.

The previous prime is 480838261517. The next prime is 480838261571. The reversal of 480838261549 is 945162838084.

It is a strong prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 290661156900 + 190177104649 = 539130^2 + 436093^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 480838261549 - 25 = 480838261517 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×4808382615493 (a number of 36 digits) contains 333 as substring.

It is a junction number, because it is equal to n+sod(n) for n = 480838261493 and 480838261502.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (480838262549) by changing a digit.

It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (23) of ones.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 240419130774 + 240419130775.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (240419130775).

Almost surely, 2480838261549 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

480838261549 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

480838261549 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

480838261549 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 13271040, while the sum is 58.

The spelling of 480838261549 in words is "four hundred eighty billion, eight hundred thirty-eight million, two hundred sixty-one thousand, five hundred forty-nine".