Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 100100111001011101000… |
… | …0101001010111001101001 |
3 | 122221210121111002210112020 |
4 | 1021302322011022321221 |
5 | 1131041240412424300 |
6 | 14441400334135053 |
7 | 1032244436025210 |
oct | 111627205127151 |
9 | 18853544083466 |
10 | 5071183326825 |
11 | 1685749867590 |
12 | 69a9b5051489 |
13 | 2aa297715cb5 |
14 | 1376375cc077 |
15 | 8bda6b778a0 |
hex | 49cba14ae69 |
5071183326825 has 48 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 10453223617536. Its totient is φ = 2107504756800.
The previous prime is 5071183326773. The next prime is 5071183326829. The reversal of 5071183326825 is 5286233811705.
It is a happy number.
It is not a de Polignac number, because 5071183326825 - 215 = 5071183294057 is a prime.
It is not an unprimeable number, because it can be changed into a prime (5071183326829) by changing a digit.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 47 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 439057717 + ... + 439069266.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (217775492032).
Almost surely, 25071183326825 is an apocalyptic number.
5071183326825 is a gapful number since it is divisible by the number (55) formed by its first and last digit.
It is an amenable number.
5071183326825 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (5382040290711).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5071183326825 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
5071183326825 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 878127014 (or 878127009 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2419200, while the sum is 51.
The spelling of 5071183326825 in words is "five trillion, seventy-one billion, one hundred eighty-three million, three hundred twenty-six thousand, eight hundred twenty-five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •