Search a number
-
+
5350503545029 is a prime number
BaseRepresentation
bin100110111011100001011…
…0111001111100011000101
3200221111120210101001201001
41031313002313033203011
51200130312401420104
615213553135533301
71061363315510536
oct115670267174305
920844523331631
105350503545029
111783154844725
12724b6898a231
132ca720089416
14146d7405468d
15942a3a8daa4
hex4ddc2dcf8c5

5350503545029 has 2 divisors, whose sum is σ = 5350503545030. Its totient is φ = 5350503545028.

The previous prime is 5350503545021. The next prime is 5350503545063. The reversal of 5350503545029 is 9205453050535.

It is a weak prime.

It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 3149464256929 + 2201039288100 = 1774673^2 + 1483590^2 .

It is a cyclic number.

It is not a de Polignac number, because 5350503545029 - 23 = 5350503545021 is a prime.

It is a super-3 number, since 3×53505035450293 (a number of 39 digits) contains 333 as substring. Note that it is a super-d number also for d = 2.

It is a self number, because there is not a number n which added to its sum of digits gives 5350503545029.

It is a congruent number.

It is not a weakly prime, because it can be changed into another prime (5350503545021) by changing a digit.

It is a polite number, since it can be written as a sum of consecutive naturals, namely, 2675251772514 + 2675251772515.

It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (2675251772515).

Almost surely, 25350503545029 is an apocalyptic number.

It is an amenable number.

5350503545029 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (1).

5350503545029 is an equidigital number, since it uses as much as digits as its factorization.

5350503545029 is an evil number, because the sum of its binary digits is even.

The product of its (nonzero) digits is 2025000, while the sum is 46.

The spelling of 5350503545029 in words is "five trillion, three hundred fifty billion, five hundred three million, five hundred forty-five thousand, twenty-nine".