Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1101101000111… |
… | …0010000101101 |
3 | 10222122100121112 |
4 | 3122032100231 |
5 | 104121041210 |
6 | 5402041405 |
7 | 1263145526 |
oct | 332162055 |
9 | 128570545 |
10 | 57205805 |
11 | 2a322628 |
12 | 171a9265 |
13 | bb0c1b7 |
14 | 785184d |
15 | 504ed05 |
hex | 368e42d |
57205805 has 4 divisors (see below), whose sum is σ = 68646972. Its totient is φ = 45764640.
The previous prime is 57205787. The next prime is 57205831. The reversal of 57205805 is 50850275.
It is a happy number.
57205805 is digitally balanced in base 2, because in such base it contains all the possibile digits an equal number of times.
It is a semiprime because it is the product of two primes.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in 2 ways, for example, as 44382244 + 12823561 = 6662^2 + 3581^2 .
It is not a de Polignac number, because 57205805 - 26 = 57205741 is a prime.
It is a Duffinian number.
It is a Curzon number.
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (13) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 3 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 5720576 + ... + 5720585.
It is an arithmetic number, because the mean of its divisors is an integer number (17161743).
Almost surely, 257205805 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
57205805 is a deficient number, since it is larger than the sum of its proper divisors (11441167).
57205805 is a wasteful number, since it uses less digits than its factorization.
57205805 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 11441166.
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 14000, while the sum is 32.
The square root of 57205805 is about 7563.4519235598. The cubic root of 57205805 is about 385.3127385263.
The spelling of 57205805 in words is "fifty-seven million, two hundred five thousand, eight hundred five".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.022 sec. • engine limits •