Base | Representation |
---|---|
bin | 1011000101010001… |
… | …11101000000000000 |
3 | 120100122201201100112 |
4 | 11202220331000000 |
5 | 44141131320310 |
6 | 2422222210452 |
7 | 300305030000 |
oct | 54250750000 |
9 | 16318651315 |
10 | 5949870080 |
11 | 2583601500 |
12 | 11a0723a28 |
13 | 73a8964ab |
14 | 4062c0000 |
15 | 24c534705 |
hex | 162a3d000 |
5949870080 has 390 divisors, whose sum is σ = 18308506818. Its totient is φ = 1854504960.
The previous prime is 5949870049. The next prime is 5949870109. The reversal of 5949870080 is 800789495.
It can be written as a sum of positive squares in only one way, i.e., 4759896064 + 1189974016 = 68992^2 + 34496^2 .
It is a congruent number.
It is an unprimeable number.
It is a pernicious number, because its binary representation contains a prime number (11) of ones.
It is a polite number, since it can be written in 29 ways as a sum of consecutive naturals, for example, 540897275 + ... + 540897285.
Almost surely, 25949870080 is an apocalyptic number.
It is an amenable number.
It is a practical number, because each smaller number is the sum of distinct divisors of 5949870080, and also a Zumkeller number, because its divisors can be partitioned in two sets with the same sum (9154253409).
5949870080 is an abundant number, since it is smaller than the sum of its proper divisors (12358636738).
It is a pseudoperfect number, because it is the sum of a subset of its proper divisors.
5949870080 is an frugal number, since it uses more digits than its factorization.
5949870080 is an odious number, because the sum of its binary digits is odd.
The sum of its prime factors is 79 (or 25 counting only the distinct ones).
The product of its (nonzero) digits is 725760, while the sum is 50.
The square root of 5949870080 is about 77135.4009518327. The cubic root of 5949870080 is about 1812.0457603201.
The spelling of 5949870080 in words is "five billion, nine hundred forty-nine million, eight hundred seventy thousand, eighty".
• e-mail: info -at- numbersaplenty.com • Privacy notice • done in 0.067 sec. • engine limits •